Marijuana as a Holy Sacrament: Is the Use of Peyote Constitutionally Distinguishable from That of Marijuana in Bona Fide Religious Ceremonies
PhD, School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution
LLM, Georgetown University Law Center
"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearingseed."
Genesis 1:29 (KingJames).
In April 1990, within one week, the Supreme Court:
1) denied certioraritoCarlEricOlsen, an Ethiopian Zion Coptic priest appealing the denial of a DEA exemption for the sacramental use of marijuana; and
2) held that the State of Oregon could deny unemployment compensation to two Native Americans who had been fired for the sacramental use of peyote.
Similarities between the twocases end there. The Supreme Court's latter holding does not change the fact that Congress and the Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA''), have decided to accommodate the religious practices of the Native American Church ("NAC''), and accord it a preferential position by establishing, pursuant to regulation, its right to religious drug use over against all other churches.
Part I of this article will set forth the favorable treatment which the federal government extends to the NAC regarding its unlimited exemption to use peyote in religious ceremonies. Part II of this article will examine the basic tenets of the Ethiopian Zion Coptic Church ("EZCC"), related to the sacramentaluse of marijuana. Part III of this article will detail the responses of theDEA and the courts to the EZCC's requests for an exemption similar to that held by the NAC. Finally, Part IV of this article will analyze the constitutionality of the differing treatment of the two religions.